MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015402627 · doi:10.5539/mer.v2n1p1

Sliding Mode Control for Uncertain Chaotic Systems with Nonlinear Inputs

2012· article· en· W2015402627 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yong‐Chun Liu, Da Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanical Engineering Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSichuan UniversitySichuan University of Science and Engineering
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ChaoticNonlinear systemSliding mode controlMode (computer interface)Computer scienceTransient (computer programming)Chaotic systemsControl (management)PhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sliding mode control design for a class of uncertain chaotic systems subject to sector nonlinear inputs and dead zone is considered in this paper. It is guaranteed that, under the proposed control law, chaotic systems can asymptotically drive the system orbits to arbitrarily desired trajectories even with both uncertainties and input nonlinearities. However, in the sliding mode, the investigated uncertain chaotic system with nonlinear input still possesses advantages of fast response, good transient performance and insensitive to the parameter uncertainties and external disturbances as the systems with linear input. Finally, the Duffing-Holmes chaotic system and the multi-scroll chaotic system are used as an illustrative example to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMechanical Engineering ResearchSame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207