MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015423040 · doi:10.1097/mph.0b013e318030ac3b

Pseudotumor Cerebri After Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant Associated With Cyclosporine A Use for Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis

2007· article· en· W2015423040 on OpenAlexaff
Raz Somech, John Doyle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePseudotumor cerebriTacrolimusAsymptomaticBone marrow transplantGraft-versus-host diseaseSurgeryBone marrowDiseaseBone marrow transplantationInternal medicineTransplantationIntracranial pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) is a syndrome of increased intracranial pressure for which several risk factors have been described. We report 2 patients who developed PTC after cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prevention after bone marrow transplant. Both patients were obese which may have also contributed to the PTC. Cessation of CsA and combinations of mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus and systemic steroids and/or acetazoleamide were effective in managing the symptoms, improving the ocular complications and keeping GvHD asymptomatic. These cases suggest that induction of PTC by CsA used for GvHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant is not rare. Physicians who are following patients on CsA need to be alert to the possibility of PTC. Prompt diagnosis followed by thorough evaluation and treatment are crucial for preventing visual loss and improving associated symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/OncologySame topicCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207