MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2015425015 · doi:10.1353/utq.2005.0239

Sun in Winter: A Toronto Wartime Journal, 1942 to 1945 (review)

2004· article· en· W2015425015 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Glenn T. Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrotherGermanWrightQueen (butterfly)HistorySpanish Civil WarDozenWorld War IIGeorge (robot)Independence (probability theory)LawArt historyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Sun in Winter: A Toronto Wartime Journal, 1942 to 1945 Glenn Wright (bio) Gunda Lambton. Sun in Winter: A Toronto Wartime Journal, 1942 to 1945 McGill-Queen’s University Press. 290. $34.95 Gunda Lambton had no easy time of it - she arrived in Canada from London, England in the fall of 1940 with a young daughter; she was now safe from the Blitz, but she was pregnant and her marriage was in shambles. She arrived with few possessions and little money. Gunda had been born in Germany in 1914, her father German, her mother English - a family background that would from time to time raise suspicions, especially since her younger brother was in the German navy. Officially, she was a 'war guest' in Canada; unofficially, and more to the point, she [End Page 497] was a struggling young mother with two children, happy to be away from London, but uncertain of her future. After a brief stay with friends of her mother-in-law in Barrie, Ontario, Gunda moved to Toronto with her two daughters and quickly demonstrated a spirited independence that would sustain her throughout the war years. Sun in Winter is an intermittent journal of Gunda's war. She held a series of jobs, including shift work at the John Inglis plant and office work for the CCF; she moved half a dozen times from one rooming house to another, but never lost sight of her objective - to provide for herself and her family. And throughout the uncertainty, she retained her dignity and met the challenge of being a single mother during the war when accommodation, especially with children, was difficult to find, and costs were high for transportation to and from work, day care, and even the necessities of life. Until she landed a job with Victory Aircraft, Gunda relied on the kindness of friends, acquaintances, and even strangers. She subsidized her income by doing portraiture (the book is sprinkled with reproductions of her fine work) and by carefully managing what little she had. The journal features a number of cameo appearances: union organizers Bill and Larry Sefton provided Gunda with employment and encouragement; Andrew Brewin offered her free legal advice; she met Nathan Cohen and they shared their interest in theatre and the arts. A fascinating cast of characters - landlords, fellow workers, and car pool companions - wander through the pages of Gunda's journal, bringing to life the daily routine of life in wartime Toronto. Caught up in personal upheaval often brought on by war, Gunda Lambton's account of her life in Toronto between 1942 and 1945 - a sequel to Frankenstein's Room, her brief memoir of growing up in Nazi Germany published in 2000 - is one woman's story of resourcefulness and courage in times of great uncertainty. She tells an engaging story in her journals, and while the text is marred with almost two dozen typographical errors, Sun in Winter is an interesting and perceptive account of the home front during the Second World War and the life of one young woman who met the challenge of being a single mother in a time of personal and social upheaval. Glenn Wright Glenn Wright, National Archives of Canada Copyright © 2005 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→