Direct numerical simulation of a 30<i>R</i> long turbulent pipe flow at <i>R</i><sup>+</sup> = 685: large- and very large-scale motions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fully developed incompressible turbulent pipe flow at Reynolds number ${\mathit{Re}}_{D} = 24\hspace{0.167em} 580$ (based on bulk velocity) and Kármán number ${R}^{+ } = 684. 8$ is simulated in a periodic domain with a length of $30$ pipe radii $R$ . While single-point statistics match closely with experimental measurements, questions have been raised of whether streamwise energy spectra calculated from spatial data agree with the well-known bimodal spectrum shape in premultiplied spectra produced by experiments using Taylor’s hypothesis. The simulation supports the importance of large- and very large-scale motions (VLSMs, with streamwise wavelengths exceeding $3R$ ). Wavenumber spectral analysis shows evidence of a weak peak or flat region associated with VLSMs, independent of Taylor’s hypothesis, and comparisons with experimental spectra are consistent with recent findings (del Álamo & Jiménez, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 640, 2009, pp. 5–26) that the long-wavelength streamwise velocity energy peak is overestimated when Taylor’s hypothesis is used. Yet, the spectrum behaviour retains otherwise similar properties to those documented based on experiment. The spectra also reveal the importance of motions of long streamwise length to the $uu$ energy and $uv$ Reynolds stress and support the general conclusions regarding these quantities formed using experimental measurements. Space–time correlations demonstrate that low-level correlations involving very large scales persist over $40R/ {U}_{\mathit{bulk}} $ in time and indicate that these motions convect at approximately the bulk velocity, including within the region approaching the wall. These very large streamwise motions are also observed to accelerate the flow near the wall based on force spectra, whereas smaller scales tend to decelerate the mean streamwise flow profile, in accordance with the behaviour observed in net force spectra of prior experiments. Net force spectra are resolved for the first time in the buffer layer and reveal an unexpectedly complex structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".