MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015433547 · doi:10.1137/090750421

A Fourier Transform Method for Spread Option Pricing

2010· article· en· W2015433547 on OpenAlexaff
T. R. Hurd, Zhuowei Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValuation of optionsComputer scienceFourier transformRange (aeronautics)ComputationExotic optionStochastic gameMathematical optimizationDerivative (finance)Fast Fourier transformVariety (cybernetics)EconometricsMathematical economicsMathematicsAlgorithmFinanceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spread options are a fundamental class of derivative contracts written on multiple assets and are widely traded in a range of financial markets. There is a long history of approximation methods for computing such products, but as yet there is no preferred approach that is accurate, efficient, and flexible enough to apply in general asset models. The present paper introduces a new formula for general spread option pricing based on Fourier analysis of the payoff function. Our detailed investigation, including a flexible and general error analysis, proves the effectiveness of a fast Fourier transform implementation of this formula for the computation of spread option prices. It is found to be easy to implement, stable, efficient, and applicable in a wide variety of asset pricing models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations189
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Financial MathematicsSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207