MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015440211 · doi:10.1021/jp056346j

Theoretical Study of Volume Changes Accompanying Xenon−Lysozyme Binding:  Implications for the Molecular Mechanism of Pressure Reversal of Anesthesia

2006· article· en· W2015440211 on OpenAlexaff
Takashi Imai, Hideto Isogai, Tomoyoshi Seto, Andriy Kovalenko, Fumio Hirata

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLysozymeXenonChemistrySolvationBinding siteBinding energyMolecular dynamicsMechanism (biology)Volume (thermodynamics)BiophysicsConformational changeComputational chemistryThermodynamicsMoleculeStereochemistryBiochemistryBiologyAtomic physicsOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The change in partial molar volume (PMV) accompanying the xenon-lysozyme binding was investigated for elucidating the molecular mechanism of the pressure reversal of general anesthesia, using the three-dimensional reference interaction site model theory of molecular solvation. An increase of the PMV from xenon binding to the substrate binding site of lysozyme was found, and the binding is suppressed by pressure, while the internal site binding did not change the PMV. The PMV change was analyzed by decomposing it into several contributions from geometry and hydration. We also analyzed the hydration change due to the binding. From the results, we draw a molecular picture of the PMV change accompanying xenon-lysozyme binding, which gives a possible mechanism of pressure reversal of anesthesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207