MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015463630 · doi:10.1002/ptr.1224

The effect of a strongly basic alkaloidal fraction of <i>Rhazya stricta</i>, a traditional medicinal plant, on cytochrome P450‐mediated metabolism of theophylline in mice

2003· article· en· W2015463630 on OpenAlexaff
Ayman O.S. El‐Kadi, M. O. M. Tanira, Badreldin H. Ali, A. K. Bashir, P. du Souich

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytotherapy Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheophyllineCytochrome P450MicrosomePharmacologyChemistryPharmacognosyAlkaloidMicrosomaMetabolismBiochemistryBiologyEnzymeBiological activityStereochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The strongly basic alkaloidal fraction of the traditional medicinal plant Rhazya stricta (RS) was given orally to mice, in a single dose of 10 mg/kg (group 1) or, twice daily for 3 days at the same dose (group 2). A third group (control) received normal saline. Liver homogenates from all animals were used to assess the microsomal activity of cytochrome P450 and its isoforms as well as its catalytic activity (using theophylline as a substrate). RS alkaloidal fraction had no significant effect on the total amount of microsomal cytochrome P450, but it caused a significant increase in the cytochrome P450 isoforms CYPs 1A1 and 1A2. It also significantly increased the concentrations of some metabolites of theophylline. These results suggest that RS has the potential to interact with other drugs that are biotransformed by cytochrome P450, when given concomitantly with it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytotherapy ResearchSame topicAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacologyFrench-language works237,207