MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015478267 · doi:10.1071/rdv24n1ab45

45 THE EFFECT OF MEIOTIC STAGE OF BOVINE OOCYTES ON THE SURVIVAL OF VITRIFIED CUMULUS–OOCYTE COMPLEXES

2011· article· en· W2015478267 on OpenAlex
J. R. Prentice, Jaswant Singh, M. Anzar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminal vesicleVitrificationOocyteCryopreservationIn vitro maturationAndrologyMeiosisBlastocystMetaphaseBiologyChemistryEmbryoEmbryogenesisCell biologyGeneticsChromosomeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitrification is a rapid freezing method in which cells/tissues are frozen in a glass state without ice crystal formation. However, vitrification of bovine oocytes is challenging due to their complex structure and sensitivity to chilling. Oocytes at the germinal vesicle (GV) stage of maturation are thought to be less prone to chromosomal and microtubular damage during cryopreservation because no spindle is present and genetic material is contained within the nucleus. However, immature oocytes are thought to be more sensitive to osmotic stress and have lower cell membrane stability than mature, metaphase II (MII) stage oocytes. The present studies aimed to validate the in vitro culture system used in our laboratory and to evaluate the effect of vitrification of bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) at different meiotic stages on their in vitro maturation (IVM), cleavage and early embryo development. Analyses were conducted on each dataset with PROC GLIMMIX in SAS using binary distribution (for yes/no response variable) and considering replicate as a random factor. In Experiment 1, meiotic progression of oocytes was evaluated at different time intervals during IVM. The following COC stages were predominantly found at different IVM time intervals: GV (89%) at 0 h, GV (47%) and germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD; 44%) at 6 h, metaphase I (MI; 90%) at 12 h and MII (84%) at 22 h (n > 62 oocytes at each time group). In Experiment 2, bovine COC at 0, 6, 12 and 22 h of IVM were exposed to vitrification solution (15% dimethyl sulfoxide + 15% ethylene glycol + 0.5 M sucrose + 20% CS in TCM-199), loaded onto a cryotop device and vitrified by plunging in liquid nitrogen. Following warming (1 min in 0.5 M sucrose + 20% CS in TCM-199), COC completed 22 h of IVM and the nuclear stage was evaluated with lamin A/C-4'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining. Upon completion of 22 h of IVM, 23, 23, 35 and 89% of oocytes from 0-, 6-, 12- and 22-h groups, respectively were detected at MII (P < 0.0001). In Experiment 3, cleavage and embryo development of oocytes vitrified at 0, 12 and 22 h of IVM were evaluated. The cleavage rate did not differ among vitrification groups (i.e. 14% at 0 h, 17% at 12 h and 14% at 22 h; P = 0.825). Cleavage and blastocyst rates were higher (P < 0.0001) in the non-vitrified (control) group than in vitrified groups (i.e. 73 vs 15% and 22 vs 0.3%, respectively). In conclusion, the maturation kinetics validated our in vitro culture system and vitrification adversely affected the ability of bovine oocytes to undergo in vitro maturation to the MII stage, in vitro fertilization and early embryo development. Vitrification of oocytes at GV, MI and MII stages of nuclear maturation did not differ in their subsequent survivability. This study was supported by the Canadian Animal Genetic Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it