MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015481206 · doi:10.1021/ma2000288

Controlled Incorporation of Particles into the Central Portion of Block Copolymer Rods and Micelles

2011· article· en· W2015481206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCopolymerMicelleRodPolymer chemistryAcrylic acidNanoparticleChemistryChemical engineeringColloidal goldBlock (permutation group theory)Materials scienceNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryPolymerAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The controlled incorporation of preformed gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) into only the central portion of polystyrene 190 - block -poly(acrylic acid) 20 (PS 190 - b -PAA 20 ) block copolymer rods and micelles is described in this note. The strategy involves the formation of the rods or micelles in solution in the presence of AuNPs coated with PS 270 - b -PAA 15 diblock copolymer. Statistical analysis shows that about 80% of the AuNPs are incorporated into the central ca. 4 vol % portion of the rods. The method does not require the block copolymers to bind, solvate, or otherwise interact during preparation with the ions of the metal involved, nor does it involve postassembly chemical reactions within the aggregates, and is thus suitable for a wide range of particles and block copolymer systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it