MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015507220 · doi:10.1002/jnr.10275

Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor applied to the motor cortex promotes sprouting of corticospinal fibers but not regeneration into a peripheral nerve transplant

2002· article· en· W2015507220 on OpenAlexaff
G. W. Hiebert, Kourosh Khodarahmi, John McGraw, J. D. Steeves, Wolfram Tetzlaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorticospinal tractPyramidal tractsNeurotrophic factorsNeurotrophinNeuroscienceSpinal cordAnatomyRegeneration (biology)Brain-derived neurotrophic factorMotor cortexMedicineBiologyInternal medicineStimulationReceptorDiffusion MRIMagnetic resonance imagingCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous experiments from our laboratory have shown that application of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to the red nucleus or the motor cortex stimulates an increase in the expression of regeneration-associated genes in rubrospinal and corticospinal neurons. Furthermore, we have previously shown that BDNF application stimulates regeneration of rubrospinal axons into a peripheral graft after a thoracic injury. The current study investigates whether application of BDNF to the motor cortex will facilitate regeneration of corticospinal neurons into a peripheral nerve graft placed into the thoracic spinal cord. In adult Sprague Dawley rats, the dorsal columns and the corticospinal tract between T9 and T10 were ablated by suction, and a 5-mm-long segment of predegenerated tibial nerve was autograft implanted into the lesion. With an osmotic pump, BDNF was infused directly into the parenchyma of the motor cortex for 14 days. Growth of the corticospinal tract into the nerve graft was then evaluated by transport of an anterograde tracer. Anterogradely labeled corticospinal fibers were not observed in the peripheral nerve graft in animals treated with saline or BDNF. Serotinergic and noradrenergic fibers, as well as peripheral sensory afferents, were observed to penetrate the graft, indicating the viability of the peripheral nerve graft as a permissive growth substrate for these specific fiber types. Although treatment of the corticospinal fibers with BDNF failed to produce regeneration into the graft, there was a distinct increase in the number of axonal sprouts rostral to the injury site. This indicates that treatment of corticospinal neurons with neurotrophins, e.g., BDNF, can be used to enhance sprouting of corticospinal axons within the spinal cord. Whether such sprouting leads to functional recovery after spinal cord injury is currently under investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience ResearchSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207