Rate-dependent fracture modeling of asphalt concrete using the discrete element method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discrete element method (DEM) represents a convenient and powerful tool for studying effects of material microstructure on fracture mechanisms in asphalt concrete. In this paper, the rate-dependency of asphalt concrete is investigated using a cohesive zone model with bulk viscoelastic properties combined with bilinear post-peak softening. Details of the constitutive models implemented in the DEM, with particular emphasis on the verification of viscoelastic models, are presented. Experimental test results based on a disk-shaped compact tension test are obtained under different loading rates and those are compared to numerical simulations with the help of the rate-dependent model. Homogeneous and heterogeneous model results are compared, where heterogeneous models are constructed to consider aggregate morphology for particles larger than 1.18 mm. The relative importance of time-dependence and the consideration of material heterogeneity in the simulation of monotonic Mode I fracture tests are demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it