Feature selection for classification of BGP anomalies using Bayesian models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traffic anomalies in communication networks greatly degrade network performance. Early detection of such anomalies alleviates their effect on network performance. A number of approaches that involve traffic modeling, signal processing, and machine learning techniques have been employed to detect network traffic anomalies. In this paper, we develop various Naive Bayes (NB) classifiers for detecting the Internet anomalies using the Routing Information Base (RIB) of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The classifiers are trained on the feature sets selected by various feature selection algorithms. We compare the Fisher, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), extended/weighted/multi-class odds ratio (EORIWORIMOR), and class discriminating measure (CDM) feature selection algorithms. The odds ratio algorithms are extended to include continuous features. The classifiers that are trained based on the features selected by the WOR algorithm achieve the highest F -score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it