MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2015542745 · doi:10.1139/p01-091

SrCu<sub>2</sub>(BO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> a two-dimensional spin liquid

2001· article· en· W2015542745 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christian Knetter, Alexander Bühler, Raghubir Singh, E. Müller‐Hartmann, Götz S. Uhrig

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHomogeneous spaceUnitary transformationUnitary stateSpin (aerodynamics)Dispersion (optics)Spectrum (functional analysis)Bound stateOrder (exchange)Energy (signal processing)Mathematical physicsTransformation (genetics)Quantum mechanicsGeometryLawQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study an extended Shastry–Sutherland model for SrCu2(BO3)2 and analyze the low-lying parts of the energy spectrum by means of a perturbative unitary transformation based on flow equations. The derivation of the one-magnon dispersion (elementary triplets) is discussed. Additionally, we give a quantitative description (symmetries and energies) of bound states made from two elementary triplets. Our high-order results allow us to fix the model parameters for SrCu2(BO3)2 precisely: J1 = 6.16(10) meV, x := J2/J1 = 0.603(3), J[Formula: see text] =1.3(2) meV. To our knowledge this is the first quantitative treatment of bound states in a true 2D model. PACS Nos.: 75.40Gb, 75.30Kz, 75.50Ee, 75.10Jm

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism→French-language works237,207→