HPLC-MS/MS analysis of the products generated from all-trans-retinoic acid using recombinant human CYP26A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two mammalian hCYP26A expression systems have been used to analyze the metabolic products of CYP26A. Through the use of extensive HPLC, UV spectroscopy, and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodology, we have conclusively demonstrated that the complex mixture of products comprises 4-OH-all-trans-retinoic acid, 4-oxo-all-trans-retinoic acid, and 18-OH-all-trans-retinoic acid, and more polar products, partially identified as dihydroxy and mono-oxo, mono-hydroxy derivatives. These more polar products are presumed to result from multiple hydroxylations on the beta-ionone ring. The inter-relationship of initial and polar metabolites was inferred from both gene-dose and time-course experiments. Both initial and secondary metabolic steps after 4-oxo-all-trans-retinoic acid are ketoconazole-sensitive, suggesting that steps in the production of water-soluble metabolites are cytochrome P450-dependent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".