MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015553616 · doi:10.1517/13543784.11.7.937

Novel therapies in the treatment of spondyloarthritis

2002· review· en· W2015553616 on OpenAlexaff
Walter P. Maksymowych

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnkylosing spondylitisPsoriatic arthritisObservational studyAdalimumabClinical trialInflammatory arthritisIntensive care medicinePlaceboTumor necrosis factor alphaArthritisInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spondyloarthritis represents one of the commonest groups of inflammatory arthritides with onset in the third and fourth decades and primarily affecting the axial skeleton. Current treatment is primarily symptomatic, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being used most commonly. No therapeutics have been shown to prevent structural damage. The development of validated and standardised outcome instruments and a composite criterion of response should encourage evaluation of new therapeutics. Anti-TNF- alpha -directed therapeutics have been shown to be dramatically effective in short-term (12 week) placebo-controlled trials in both ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis whilst observational cohorts describe efficacy that is maintained for over one year. Treatment has been well-tolerated, with mycobacterial infections being the primary concern. Significant costs and the requirement for continuous therapy are likely to spur the development of orally bioavailable agents targeting TNF- alpha expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Investigational DrugsSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207