MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015614735 · doi:10.4043/19510-ms

LNG Imports Into North America and Implications

2008· article· en· W2015614735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mike Juden, Tommy Inglesby, Stuart Bodden

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquefied natural gasNatural gasProcurementEconomic shortageBusinessNatural resource economicsPetroleumInternational tradeEconomicsWaste managementEngineeringGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The need for LNG to fill the natural gas supply gap in North America may increase dramatically to 2015 and beyond as natural gas demand increases at rates higher than most observers expect. Developing CO2 legislation, increasingly advantaged gas-fired generation, oil sands demand, and biofuels demand could drive a greater than expected demand for natural gas domestically, with LNG imports expected to fill the gap. However, LNG liquefaction is expected to continue to be short to 2015 and beyond. These shortages are driven by increasing liquefaction costs, contractor/crew shortages, reserve access issues, project delays, and the often overlooked increasing domestic demand in the LNG exporting counties. Increasingly, LNG contracts will include flexible diversion clauses allowing movement of LNG supplies to markets other than originally contracted markets. Although there is some baseloaded North American LNG, significant LNG is attracted to North American regas based on price/producer-net-backs when other regions have adequate supplies to meet needs. The trend toward greater LNG flexibility could strengthen the linkage in North American natural gas pricing to alternate fuels through competition with Europe for LNG volumes priced at residual fuel oil and eventually with Asian crude-linked LNG. North America will compete with Europe and Asia for marginal LNG supplies unless European end users have over-contracted for LNG, which may well be the case. European and Asian end users, with based-loaded LNG, will retain LNG supplies, when needed, to fill supply needs irrespective of price. Over-contracted European LNG, if it were to flow to North America, would represent approximately 10 percent or more of U.S. and Canadian demand in 2010 and would go a long way in meeting a potential supply short-fall. With LNG at the margin, mechanisms impacting the level of North American LNG imports influence natural gas pricing, which in turn impacts gas producer and power generator profitability and company valuations. Introduction North American natural gas demand, domestic supply, natural gas price setting mechanisms, Atlantic Basin pricing dynamics, and contracting regulations and practices for electric and natural gas utilities all impact the level of LNG imported into North America. The resulting flows of LNG, especially into the U.S., have very significant implications for the global LNG trade, as well as substantial and far-reaching implications for producers, LNG developers, end users, and policy-makers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207