MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015647010 · doi:10.12745/et.6.1.640

Puritans and Performers in Early Modern Dorset

2003· article· en· W2015647010 on OpenAlexaffvenue
C. E. McGee

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Theatre · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooSt. Jerome's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoroughDramaPower (physics)HistoryConnection (principal bundle)Prejudice (legal term)ArtLiteratureLawArchaeologyPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historians studying the towns of Dorset have regularly attributed the decline of ancient local customs and the cool reception given to travelling players to the increasing power of puritan factions within borough élites. Only once, however, do the records of early English drama explicitly confirm that connection. Focusing on the Cobb ale of Lyme Regis, the arrest of William Sands' puppeteers in Beaminster, and the controversy over a performance by Lord Berkeley's men in Dorchester, this paper re-assesses the importance of the anti-theatrical prejudice of puritans among the complex forces that caused the decline of theatrical activity in Jacobean Dorset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly TheatreSame topicPhilippine History and CultureFrench-language works237,207