MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015649369 · doi:10.1080/10413200903018667

An Evaluation of Personal and Contextual Factors in Competitive Youth Sport

2009· article· en· W2015649369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Sport Psychology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Development and Social Support
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)ElitePsychologyPositive Youth DevelopmentSport psychologySports scienceBurnoutSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicinePolitical scienceHistoryPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because millions of youth are involved in sport, the sport context is important to consider in advancing the growth experiences of young people (Côté et al., 2007 Côté, J., Strachan, L. and Fraser-Thomas, J. 2007. “Participation, personal development and performance through youth sport”. In Positive youth development through sport, Edited by: Holt, N. L. 34–45. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]; Fraser-Thomas et al., 2005 Fraser-Thomas, J., Côté, J. and Deakin, J. 2005. Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(1): 19–40. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]). Furthermore, research in developmental psychology has highlighted the value of structured programs, including sport, in helping to promote positive youth development (Fredricks & Eccles, 2006 Fredricks, J. A. and Eccles, J. S. 2006. Extracurricular involvement and adolescent adjustment: Impact of duration, number of activities, and breadth of participation. Applied Developmental Science, 10(3): 132–146. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]). Youth sport involvement has been linked to high levels of enjoyment (Scanlan et al., 1989 Scanlan, T. K., Stein, G. L. and Ravizza, K. 1989. An in-depth study of former elite figure skaters: II. Sources of enjoyment. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11: 65–83. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), however, negative outcomes, such as burnout, have also been reported (Gould et al., 1996 Gould, D., Tuffey, S., Udry, E. and Loehr, J. 1996. Burnout in competitive tennis players: II. Qualitative analysis. The Sport Psychologist, 10: 341–366. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). In the present study, the Developmental Assets Profile (Search Institute, 2004 Search Institute. 2004. Developmental assets profile preliminary user manual, Minneapolis, MN: Author. [Google Scholar]) was used to explore personal (internal assets) and contextual (external assets) outcomes associated with youth sport. Results suggest that three particular assets (positive identity, empowerment, and support) are important to focus on in youth sport programs to decrease burnout symptoms and enhance enjoyment. Path analyses were also conducted to test a proposed model and exploratory results confirmed links of particular assets to sport outcomes. The results are discussed in terms of integration with Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory (1999) and recommendations are suggested for sport programmers to consider to develop these assets within youth sport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it