Primary Lesser Omentum Torsion - An Extremely Rare Cause of Acute Abdomen and a Very Uncommon Subtype of Intraperitoneal Focal Fat Infarction (IFFI): Case Report and Review of the Literature
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a case of a 17-year-old patient who presented with sharp epigastric pain and features of acute abdomen and was finally diagnosed and treated during laparotomy where a lesser omentum torsion was detected. Such cases are extremely rare while the clinical manifestations mimic other causes of acute abdomen. On the other side, the technological progress of the imaging techniques has allowed during the last years, the unification of all these entities which present with focal fat tissue necrosis such as torsion and/or infarction of the greater/lesser omentum or an epiploic appendage, under the term ‘Intraperitoneal Focal Fat Infarction’ (IFFI), due to their common features, encouraging parallelly the conservative treatment due to the spontaneous self-limiting evolution in most cases. The report is followed by a review of the literature regarding the diagnostic means and choices of treatment of these rare conditions. J Med Cases. 2013;4(7):499-503 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jmc1317w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it