MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015701147 · doi:10.4000/rga.2276

Métisser les savoirs pour négocier avec et sur un volcan

2014· article· fr· W2015701147 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Baptiste Bing

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de géographie alpine · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organisé en cercles concentriques hiérarchisés, le monde javanais trouve l’une de ses limites en montagne. Domaine du supra-humain (dieux, esprits) autant que de l’infra-humain (animaux et plantes sauvages), ces limites demandent à être abordées avec précaution, par une négociation permanente avec les forces qui y vivent. Cette conception holistique de la place de l’homme dans le monde tend à se voir contestée par un double mouvement puissant en Indonésie depuis une trentaine d’années, mêlant islamisation et modernisation. Ce processus transforme la notion de frontière entre humain et non-humain, tant sur le plan symbolique et intellectuel que sur le plan des pratiques spatiales. Des savoirs et savoir-faire métis semblent désormais dominer dans les diverses couches de la société ; leur confrontation provoque de très concrètes difficultés (aménagement et contrôle des territoires, accès aux ressources locales...), mais elle débouche également sur un renouvellement de la territorialité liée aux marges écouménales que sont la forêt et le cratère.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de géographie alpineSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207