MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015722368 · doi:10.5430/ijfr.v5n1p114

The Analysis on the Introduction of Islamic Financial Model in Ethnic Region in Gansu, China

2014· article· en· W2015722368 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haiying Ma, Yike Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNorthwest University for NationalitiesNorthwest University
KeywordsIslamChinaFinancial crisisVitalityEthnic groupBottleneckInvestment (military)Islamic financeLoanFinanceEconomicsFinancial systemBusinessPolitical scienceGeographyMacroeconomicsPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United States sub-loan crisis has caused a serious worldwide financial crisis. However, during the time when lots of western financial institutions broke down, Islamic financial institutions just received tiny impacts. The unique investment philosophies of Islamic finance draws more and more people’s attention. Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, which is called “the eastern Mecca”, has gained the humanistic connotations and environmental advantage of Islamic culture by nature. Thus, it will be easy to establish the relationship of cultural communication and financial cooperation. To set up an Islamic financial model which suits the economic characteristics of the ethnic region will solve the problem of bottleneck on financing effectively. It may also make a contribution to avoid financial crisis, increase the vitality of substantial economic, combine Islamism to modern financial system, as well as prompt the economical stable development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Financial ResearchSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207