MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015750033 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638363

Optimal task-level scheduling for cloud based multimedia applications

2013· article· en· W2015750033 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoming Nan, Yifeng He, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingCloud computingScheduling (production processes)Two-level schedulingVirtual machineDynamic priority schedulingScheduleFair-share schedulingDirected acyclic graphTask analysisFixed-priority pre-emptive schedulingMultimediaTask (project management)Rate-monotonic schedulingOperating systemAlgorithmMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an emerging computing paradigm, cloud computing has been increasingly used in multimedia applications. One fundamental challenge for application providers is how to effectively schedule multimedia tasks to multiple virtual machines for distributed processing. In this paper, we study task-level scheduling problem for cloud based multimedia applications. Specifically, we introduce a directed acyclic graph to model precedence constraints among tasks. Based on the model, we study the optimal task scheduling problem for the sequential, the parallel, and the mixed structures, respectively. Moreover, we propose a heuristic to perform the near optimal task scheduling in a practical way. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed scheduling scheme can optimally assign tasks to virtual machines to minimize the execution time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207