MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015761588 · doi:10.1109/icc.2012.6363948

Joint load balancing and admission control in OFDMA-based femtocell networks

2012· article· en· W2015761588 on OpenAlexaff
Long Bao Le, Dinh Thai Hoang, Dusit Niyato, Ekram Hossain, Dong In Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemtocellComputer scienceMacrocellComputer networkThroughputPower controlAdmission controlTransmitter power outputCellular networkMarkov decision processBase stationDistributed computingMarkov processPower (physics)Quality of serviceWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the admission control problem for hybrid access in OFDMA-based femtocell networks. We assume that Macrocell User Equipments (MUEs) can establish connections with Femtocell Base Stations (FBSs) to improve their QoSs. Both MUEs and Femtocell User Equipments (FUEs) have minimum rate requirements, which depend on their geographical locations and maybe their running applications. In addition, blocking probability constraints are imposed on each FUE so that connections from MUEs only result in controllable performance degradation for FUEs. We show how to formulate the admission control problem as a Semi-Markov Decision Process (SMDP) and present a Linear Programming (LP) based solution approach. Moreover, we develop a novel femtocell power adaptation algorithm, which can be implemented in a distributed manner jointly with the proposed admission control scheme. This power adaptation algorithm enables to achieve better cell throughput and more energy-efficient operation of the femtocell network considering the heterogeneity of traffic load in the network. Finally, numerical results are presented to illustrate the desirable performance of the optimal admission control solution and the significant throughput and power saving gains of the proposed cross-layer solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207