Joint load balancing and admission control in OFDMA-based femtocell networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the admission control problem for hybrid access in OFDMA-based femtocell networks. We assume that Macrocell User Equipments (MUEs) can establish connections with Femtocell Base Stations (FBSs) to improve their QoSs. Both MUEs and Femtocell User Equipments (FUEs) have minimum rate requirements, which depend on their geographical locations and maybe their running applications. In addition, blocking probability constraints are imposed on each FUE so that connections from MUEs only result in controllable performance degradation for FUEs. We show how to formulate the admission control problem as a Semi-Markov Decision Process (SMDP) and present a Linear Programming (LP) based solution approach. Moreover, we develop a novel femtocell power adaptation algorithm, which can be implemented in a distributed manner jointly with the proposed admission control scheme. This power adaptation algorithm enables to achieve better cell throughput and more energy-efficient operation of the femtocell network considering the heterogeneity of traffic load in the network. Finally, numerical results are presented to illustrate the desirable performance of the optimal admission control solution and the significant throughput and power saving gains of the proposed cross-layer solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".