MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015772096 · doi:10.1021/ie060310b

Electrochemical Methods for Degradation of Orange II (Sodium 4-(2-Hydroxy-1-naphthylazo)benzenesulfonate)

2006· article· en· W2015772096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryElectrolysisHypochloriteElectrochemistryInorganic chemistrySupporting electrolyteMineralization (soil science)Bulk electrolysisChlorineAnodeElectrolyteAmmoniumChlorideElectrodeOrganic chemistryNitrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In divided flow-through cells, reductive electrolysis of Orange II ( 1 ) was first order in both substrate and applied current and gave the products of reductive cleavage at the azo linkage in essentially quantitative yield. Oxidative electrolysis was also pseudo-first-order and led to mineralization. At a boron-doped diamond anode, the rate of disappearance of 1 closely tracked the loss of total organic carbon from solution. In undivided cells oxidation and reduction occurred simultaneously; under acidic conditions the reduction products (anilines) were rather persistent because they were present as ammonium ions, but under alkaline conditions the anilines were mineralized along with the starting material. When chloride ion was present in the supporting electrolyte, electrochemical oxidation afforded hypochlorite, and the disappearance of 1 proceeded by way of hypochlorination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it