MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015804420 · doi:10.1063/1.2001737

PbS quantum dot electroabsorption modulation across the extended communications band 1200–1700nm

2005· article· en· W2015804420 on OpenAlexaff
Ethan J. D. Klem, Larissa Levina, Edward H. Sargent

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum dotModulation (music)NanocrystalStark effectDipoleQuantum-confined Stark effectAbsorption (acoustics)Spectral lineOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceElectric fieldAbsorption spectroscopyCondensed matter physicsPhysicsOpticsNanotechnologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report electric field-induced modulation of absorption in PbS nanocrystal quantum dots across the spectral region 600–2000nm, encompassing the entire telecommunications band. The maxima in the electroabsorption spectra correspond with the positions of the first excitonic peak, confirming the predominance of excitonic broadening as the basis for the observed effect. We estimate the change in dipole moment to be on the order of 20 D in 7nm diameter PbS nanocrystals compared to previously-reported ∼100D in CdSe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207