Automatic needle segmentation in three-dimensional ultrasound images using two orthogonal two-dimensional image projections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we describe an algorithm to segment a needle from a three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound image by using two orthogonal two-dimensional (2D) image projections. Not only is the needle more conspicuous in a projected (volume-rendered) image, but its direction in 3D lies in the plane defined by the projection direction and the needle direction in the projected 2D image. Hence, using two such projections, the 3D vector describing the needle direction lies along the intersection of the two corresponding planes. Thus, the task of 3D needle segmentation is reduced to two 2D needle segmentations. For improved accuracy and robustness, we use orthogonal projection directions (both orthogonal to a given a priori estimate of the needle direction), and use volume cropping and Gaussian transfer functions to remove complex background from the 2D projection images. To evaluate our algorithm, we tested it with 3D ultrasound images of agar and turkey breast phantoms. Using a 500 MHz personal computer equipped with a commercial volume-rendering card, we found that our 3D needle segmentation algorithm performed in near real time (about 10 fps) with a root-mean-square accuracy in needle length and endpoint coordinates of better than 0.8 mm, and about 0.5 mm on average, for needles lengths in the 3D image from 4.0 mm to 36.7 mm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".