MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015820505 · doi:10.1142/s0219720006001898

SELECTIVE TARGETING OF INDEL-INFERRED DIFFERENCES IN SPATIAL STRUCTURES OF HOMOLOGOUS PROTEINS

2006· article· en· W2015820505 on OpenAlexafffund
Yvonne Y. Li, Steven J.M. Jones, Artem Cherkasov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreMichael Smith Health Research BCUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsBiologyVirulenceIn silicoPeptide sequenceGeneticsHuman pathogenComputational biologySequence alignmentProtein sequencingProtein superfamilyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eukaryotic pathogen Leishmania donovani possesses a housekeeping protein Elongation-Factor-1alpha (EF-1alpha) which has been found to be unexpectedly involved in the pathogen's virulence. Because it is associated with virulence and essential for cell survival, this protein is an attractive choice for drug targeting; however, its sequence is highly similar (> 80% sequence identity) to that of its human homolog, rendering it a risky choice for a drug target. The chief difference between these two proteins has been found to be a 12 amino acid sequence present in human EF-1alpha but absent from leishmania EF-1alpha. Furthermore, it has been shown that this 12 amino acid insert in the human sequence corresponds to a hairpin loop on the surface of the protein. In this study, we searched for those spatial features in leishmania EF-1alpha that are impacted or obscured by the extra hairpin loop in the human counterpart. We have also conducted a large-scale in silico screening for small molecules that could plausibly bind to these protein features. While experimental evidence is required to verify our results, our findings thus far appear to support this approach as a new strategy for the development of antagonists against pathogenic targets having close human homologs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bioinformatics and Computational BiologySame topicResearch on Leishmaniasis StudiesFrench-language works237,207