Hydration of Pyridylketenes: Formation of Acid Enol and Dihydropyridine (Eneaminone) Transients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2-, 3-, and 4-Pyridylketenes 4 formed in water by photochemical Wolff rearrangements using flash photolysis undergo rapid hydration forming transient intermediates observed by UV spectroscopy. 3-Pyridylketene (3-4) formed the acid enol intermediate 3-10 which was converted to the acid 3-11, and phenylketene gave similar behavior. 4-Pyridylketene (4-4) reacted with a similar initial rate constant of 5.0 x 10(4) s(-1) for decay of an absorption at 275 nm, with concomitant formation of a strong absorption at 370 nm with the same rate constant. The intermediate absorbing at 370 nm decayed with a lifetime 2.4 x 10(3) fold longer than that of the ketene, and is identified as 4-(carboxymethylene)-1,4-dihydropyridine (4-13), resulting from conjugate 1,6-addition of H(2)O to 4-4. 2-Pyridylketene (2-4) underwent hydration with a similar rate constant of 1.1 x 10(4) s(-1) forming a transient with a UV absorption with maxima at 310 and 380 nm that decayed with biexponetial kinetics, with rate constants slower than the rate of formation by factors of 5.2 and 110, respectively. These results are interpreted as indicating the presence of two species, namely Z- and E-2-(carboxymethylene)-1,2-dihydropyridines (2-13), resulting from conjugate 1,4-addition of H(2)O to 2-4. The identifications of the 1,2- and 1,4-(carboxymethylene)dihydropyridines 2- and 4-13 were confirmed by comparison of their UV spectra with those of the corresponding N-methyl derivatives. The amination of 2-pyridylketene in CH(3)CN was reinvestigated, and spectroscopic evidence, computational studies, and preparation of the N-methyl analogue demonstrated formation of the 1,2-dihydropyridine Z-2-8f as the long-lived intermediate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".