Involvement of the amino‐terminal β‐hairpin of the <i>Aspergillus</i> ribotoxins on the interaction with membrances and nonspecific ribonuclease activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ribotoxins are a family of potent cytotoxic proteins from Aspergillus whose members display a high sequence identity (85% for about 150 amino acid residues). The three-dimensional structures of two of these proteins, alpha-sarcin and restrictocin, are known. They interact with phospholipid bilayers, according to their ability to enter cells, and cleave a specific phosphodiester bond in the large subunit of ribosome thus inhibiting protein biosynthesis. Two nonconservative sequence changes between these proteins are located at the amino-terminal beta-hairpin of alpha-sarcin, a characteristic structure that is absent in other nontoxic structurally related microbial RNases. These two residues of alpha-sarcin, Lys 11 and Thr 20, have been substituted with the equivalent amino acids in restrictocin. The single mutants (K11L and T20D) and the corresponding K11L/T20D double mutant have been produced in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity. The spectroscopic characterization of the purified proteins reveals that the overall native structure is preserved. The ribonuclease and lipid-perturbing activities of the three mutants and restrictocin have been evaluated and compared with those of alpha-sarcin. These proteins exhibit the same ability to specifically inactivate ribosomes, although they show different activity against nonspecific substrate analogs such as poly(A). The mutant variant K11L and restrictocin display a lower phospholipid-interacting ability correlated with a decreased cytotoxicity. The results obtained are interpreted in terms of the involvement of the amino-terminal beta-hairpin in the interaction with both membranes and polyadenylic acid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".