MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015861674 · doi:10.1142/s0129626407003010

PARALLEL ALGORITHMS FOR CELLULAR MODELS SIMULATION

2007· article· en· W2015861674 on OpenAlexaff
Shafagh Jafer, Gabriel Wainer

Bibliographic record

VenueParallel Processing Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDEVSComputer scienceRollbackParallel computingFormalism (music)Execution timeKernel (algebra)Discrete event simulationModeling and simulationDistributed computingAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceSimulationProgramming languageDatabase transactionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DEVS is a sound formal modeling and simulation (M&S) framework based on generic dynamic system concepts. Cell-DEVS is a formalism for cell-shaped models based on DEVS. This work presents a new simulation technique for execution of DEVS and Cell-DEVS models in parallel environments. These techniques are modifications to the original Time Warp mechanism offered by WARPED kernel. Time Warp functionalities are revised to include two new algorithms namely, Local Rollback Frequency Model (LRFM) and Global Rollback Frequency Model (GRFM). The resulting simulator is used as new simulation engine for CD++, an M&S toolkit that implements DEVS and Cell-DEVS theories. The results obtained allowed us to achieve considerable speedups due to the reductions that LRFM and GRFM protocols perform on number of rollbacks and anti-messages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParallel Processing LettersSame topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207