MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015864178 · doi:10.1118/1.2244685

Sci‐Fri PM Imaging‐10: LabPETtm: A Second‐Generation APD‐Based Digital Scanner for High‐Resolution Small Animal PET Imaging

2006· article· en· W2015864178 on OpenAlexaff
Roger Lecomte, RA deKemp, Ran Klein, J. Cadorette, MD Lepage, G. Robert, Vitali Selivanov, François Bélanger, Hicham Semmaoui, Marc‐André Tétrault, Nicolas Viscogliosi, M. Bergeron, François Lemieux, MA Lemonde, Réjean Fontaine

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLyso-ScannerPhysicsOpticsImage resolutionAvalanche photodiodeImaging phantomMedical imagingFull width at half maximumScintillatorComputer scienceDetectorArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LabPET™ is a novel APD‐based PET scanner with quasi‐individual crystal readout and highly parallel digital architecture for high‐performance in vivo molecular imaging of small animals. It consists of 16 rings, 16.2 cm in diameter, each formed by 192 2×2×(9.9–11.3) mm3 scintillators assembled in LYSO/LGSO phoswich pairs read out by an avalanche photodiode (APD). The field of view extends up to 110 mm in diameter by 37.5 mm axially. The dual‐crystal readout scheme avoids resolution degradation due to light‐ or charge‐sharing and enables very high singles count rates with low dead time. Advanced parallel algorithms for signal processing and analysis implemented in high‐performance programmable devices perform crystal identification, energy discrimination and time stamping of individual pixels in real‐time. Virtually error‐free crystal identification is achieved using an auto‐regressive moving average method. Coincidence events are sorted in real‐time and recorded in list‐mode, together with scanner status information and animal physiological data. The intrinsic spatial resolution (both radial and axial) at the FOV center is 1.2 mm FWHM (2.3 mm FWTM). The 1.2‐mm diameter hot rods can be clearly resolved in images of a resolution phantom. Preliminary time resolutions of 2.5 and 3.9 ns FWHM were obtained respectively for LYSO‐LYSO and LGSO‐LGSO coincidences using an auto‐regressive least‐mean square timing algorithm. The system is implemented with ancillary devices (injectors, life‐sign monitors, blood counter…) controlled through a centralized user‐interface, offering a fully integrated solution for performing demanding molecular imaging investigations with increased throughput in a busy research environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207