Isoflux Nusselt Number and Slip Length Formulae for Superhydrophobic Microchannels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We analytically and numerically consider the hydrodynamic and thermal transport behavior of fully developed laminar flow through a superhydrophobic (SH) parallel-plate channel. Hydrodynamic slip length, thermal slip length and heat flux are prescribed at each surface. We first develop a general expression for the Nusselt number valid for asymmetric velocity profiles. Next, we demonstrate that, in the limit of Stokes flow near the surface and an adiabatic and shear-free liquid–gas interface, both thermal and hydrodynamic slip lengths can be found by redefining existing solutions for conduction spreading resistances. Expressions for the thermal slip length for pillar and ridge surface topographies are determined. Comparison of fundamental half-space solutions for the Laplace and Stokes equations facilitate the development of expressions for hydrodynamic slip length over pillar-structured surfaces based on existing solutions for the conduction spreading resistance from an isothermal source. Numerical validation is performed and an analysis of the idealized thermal transport behavior suggests conditions under which superhydrophobic microchannels may enhance heat transfer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it