Les horizons géographiques, entre continu et discontinu<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse la métaphore de l'éducation et du politique, couramment désignée comme allégorie de la caverne de Platon. Il développe la notion géographique d'horizon de nouveauté et d'altérité comme ≪ dialectique ≫ du continu et du discontinu autant que comme articulation entre mobilité et immobilité humaines. En retour, il pose la question de l'horizontalité, toujours montrée mais jamais dite, comme critique d'une métaphore écrasée par la verticalité qui institue le lien politique non dans le rapport à l'autre mais comme transcendance et fonde l'éducation humaine sur l'écrasement de l'émotion. Au‐delà de ces lectures, le texte de Platon permet d'articuler philosophie et géographie dans un ≪ logos ≫ commun et constitue, ainsi, non seulement l'un des fondements d'une approche anthropologique de la géographie mais, avec elle, l'un de ceux du monde occidental et de sa pensée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".