MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015907914 · doi:10.1021/bp0256465

Integrated Process for the Enzymatic Synthesis of the Octapeptide PhAcCCK‐8

2002· article· en· W2015907914 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mercè Fité, Pere Clapés, Josep López‐Santín, M. Dolors Benaiges, Glòria Caminal

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology Progress · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsYield (engineering)ChemistryEnzymePeptideProteasesCholecystokininRaw materialPeptide synthesisCombinatorial chemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A process for the enzymatic synthesis of PhAcCCK-8 is presented. The CCK-8 (CCK(26-33)) peptide fragment is the minimum sequence with biological activity of the cholecystokinin hormone. A synthetic convergent strategy has been developed starting from amino acid derivatives as raw materials, employing proteases as biocatalysts for each peptide coupling. The enzymes have been immobilized by deposition onto solid supports in order to be employed in organic media at low water activity. N-terminal protecting groups such as PhAc, which can be introduced and removed enzymatically, have been employed. The synthesis process has been set up at preparative level with focus in the integration of reaction and separation steps with an overall yield of 15%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology ProgressSame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207