Effect of supplementing high levels of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> on calcium homeostasis of steers fed barley-based finishing diets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementing high levels of vitamin D3 to steers fed barley-grain-based finishing diets on Ca metabolism. Fifteen Hereford steers (607 ± 12 kg) were individually penned and fed at 0800 and 1600 with a ration consisting of 90% barley-grain-based concentrate and 10% barley silage [dry matter (DM) basis]. Steers were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: 0, 2.5 or 5 million IU (MIU) of vitamin D3 steer-1 d-1 for 7 d. Daily blood samples were obtained for measurement of serum for total and ionized Ca, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitonin and plasma for vitamin D3 and 25(OH)D3. Data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis and single degree of freedom contrasts. Feed intake was depressed relative to control animals by 18 and 37% for the 2.5 and 5 MIU D3 treatments, respectively. Relative to controls, total and ionized Ca increased (P < 0.05) by 8 and 19% and 6 and 18% for the 2.5 and 5 MIU D3 treatments, respectively. Serum PTH concentrations were reduced (P < 0.05) by vitamin D3 feeding with the greatest reduction seen with animals fed the 5 MIU treatment. Calcitonin values were not (P > 0.05) affected. Relative to controls, plasma vitamin D3 concentrations increased (P < 0.05) in a quadratic fashion over time with vitamin D3 supplementation, while that of 25(OH)D3 increased (P < 0.05) in a linear fashion. It was concluded that the increase in serum calcium was stimulated by a rise in plasma vitamin D3 and the resulting increased 25(OH)D3 concentrations, which have been shown to influence calcium absorption either directly or via induced synthesis of 1,25(OH)2D3. Key words: Calcium homeostasis, vitamin D3, cattle, beef tenderness
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".