MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015964853 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5626065

Complexity analysis of the uterine electromyography

2010· article· en· W2015964853 on OpenAlexaff
Bassam Moslem, Mohamad Khalil, Catherine Marque, Mohamad O. Diab

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsBurman University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSample entropyElectromyographySurrogate dataComputer scienceEntropy (arrow of time)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Physical medicine and rehabilitationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In respect to the main goal of our ongoing work for predicting preterm birth, we analyze in this paper the complexity of the uterine electromyography (EMG) by using the sample entropy (SampEn) algorithm. By considering recent methodological developments, we measure the SampEn over multiple scales using the wavelet packet decomposition method. The results obtained from the analyzed data indicate that SampEn decreases along pregnancy. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the computed SampEn parameter may discriminate between the two classes (pregnancy/labor). The results are supported by statistical analysis using t-test indicating good statistical significance with a confidence level of 95%. A surrogate data test is also performed to investigate the nature of the underlying dynamics of our experimental data. The results are very promising for monitoring pregnancy and detecting labor to help identify preterm labor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207