Quantitative analysis of bucillamine in blood using high‐performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry technique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A fast and sensitive method has been developed and validated for the determination of bucillamine in human blood by derivatizing the free sulfhydryl groups with isobutyl acrylate (IA), by APCI-LC/MS/MS. The collected blood sample was immediately mixed with a mixture of IA and 0.05 m Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane hydrochloride (Tris-HCl) buffer, pH 9.2, to stabilize the sulfyhydryl moieties. The derivatized samples were then extracted by protein precipitation, evaporated, reconstituted and injected using an LC-APCI/MS/MS instrument. Separation was achieved using a C18 analytical column and a gradient mobile phase within a chromatographic run time of 5 min. A quadratic (weighted 1/concentration(2)) relationship was observed during validation over a concentration range of 0.4-40 microg/mL with a correlation value of r > or = 0.9966. The inter-batch precision and accuracy at low, medium and high concentrations were 8.1, 8.4 and 7.3%; 113.3, 104.9 and 103.9%, respectively, and the intra-batch precision and accuracy at low, medium and high concentrations were 7.7, 5.4 and 2.7%; 105.1, 111.9 and 113.2%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it