Spectroscopy and potential energy surface of the H<sub>2</sub>–CO<sub>2</sub>van der Waals complex: experimental and theoretical studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 4-D ab initio potential energy surface is calculated for the intermolecular interaction of hydrogen and carbon dioxide, using the CCSD(T) method with a large basis set. The surface has a global minimum with a well depth of 212 cm(-1) and an intermolecular distance of 2.98 A for a planar configuration with both the O-C-O and H-H axes perpendicular to the intermolecular axis. Bound state calculations are performed for the H(2)-CO(2) van der Waals complex with H(2) in both the para and ortho spin states, and the binding energy of paraH(2)-CO(2)(50.4 cm(-1)) is found to be significantly less than that of orthoH(2)-CO(2)(71.7 cm(-1)). The surface supports 7 bound intermolecular vibrational states for paraH(2)-CO(2) and 19 for orthoH(2)-CO(2), and the lower rotational levels with J< or = 4 follow an asymmetric rotor pattern. The calculated infrared spectrum of paraH(2)-CO(2) agrees well with experiment. For orthoH(2)-CO(2), the ground state rotational levels allowed by symmetry are found to have (K(a), K(c))=(even, odd) or (odd, even). This somewhat unexpected fact enables the previously observed experimental spectrum to be assigned for the first time, in good agreement with theory, and indicates that the orientation of hydrogen is perpendicular to the intermolecular axis in the ground state of the orthoH(2)-CO(2) complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".