MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016022280 · doi:10.1103/physreve.79.011902

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∕</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>noise in reaction times: A proposed model based on Piéron’s law and information processing

2009· article· lv· W2016022280 on OpenAlexfundno aff
José M. Medina

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2009
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversidad de GranadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsAlgorithmBrownian motionNoise (video)Artificial intelligencePower functionComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Piéron's law relates human reaction times to the intensity of a sensory stimulus by a power function. The neural processes responsible for this nonlinear behavior are not understood. A simple neural model based on the Brownian motion of spikes and information theory is presented. The model shows that Piéron's law is a transformation function in time. The shape of Piéron's law is invariant and scales into the intensity-response function of single neurons in a fractal-like process. The model also shows that Piéron's law gives rise to 1/falpha noise together with a high-frequency thermal noise limit. It is proposed that the biophysical origin of reaction time variability is related to a form of noise-induced synchronization in weakly coupled neurons. The implications in visual-motor transduction are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207