THEMIS observations of consecutive bursts of Pi2 pulsations: The 20 April 2007 event
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On 20 April 2007, four Pi2 pulsation bursts occurred successively and simultaneously in the premidnight sector at the E spacecraft and ground‐based observatories for the THEMIS mission, while the AE index was less than 100 nT. Especially for the last three onsets, both ground‐based and GOES 12 magnetometers sensed magnetic perturbations, as expected from the formation of a substorm current wedge (SCW). Moreover, LANL 1994–084 detected an enhancement of energetic particle flux. Spectral analysis shows a matched wave frequency ∼6–8 mHz and another harmonic frequency ∼17 mHz for the fourth burst. The orientation of the major axis of the wave polarization hodogram points toward the SCW location. The first burst has both latitudinal and longitudinal polarization changes from counterclockwise (CCW) to clockwise (CW), in contrast to the other three that have a latitudinal reversal only. The longitudinal CW to CCW change at low latitudes signifies that hydromagnetic waves propagate westward and eastward from the longitude of the impulsive source responsible for SCW. The latitudinal CW to CCW reversal is consistent with induction by a westward moving upward field‐aligned current carried by Alfvén waves leading to field line oscillations. Consequently, they can be explained by the coupling of a fast magnetospheric cavity mode driven by fast compressional waves to field line resonances as expected from braking bursty bulk flows, resulting from magnetotail reconnection, triggered by a preceding northward interplanetary magnetic field turning. This event shows that the source mechanism of consecutive Pi2 onsets at times of weak geomagnetic activity is the same as during substorm times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".