MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016040370 · doi:10.1021/la052922r

Carbon 1s X-ray Photoemission Line Shape Analysis of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite:  The Influence of Structural Damage on Peak Asymmetry

2005· article· en· W2016040370 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHighly oriented pyrolytic graphiteAsymmetryPyrolytic carbonX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceGraphiteCarbon fibersSpectral lineAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Photoemission spectroscopyMolecular physicsComponent (thermodynamics)Atomic physicsChemistryNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C 1s XPS spectra of various highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) surfaces, untreated, as well as those treated by keV Ar+ beam bombardment and low-energy O2, N2, Ar, and H2O plasmas, have been systematically studied by comparing two XPS peak-fitting procedures. These procedures treat the spectrum as either (1) the overlap of several symmetric component peaks or (2) a single asymmetric peak. The results indicate that, in the case of HOPG, the asymmetry parameter defining the single peak is directly related to the extent of damage to the alternant hydrocarbon structure of the HOPG surface, as manifested by its correlation with the symmetric peak component due to the damaged HOPG structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it