MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016048717 · doi:10.1002/chin.201429026

ChemInform Abstract: Ternary Rare‐Earth Manganese Germanides RE<sub>3</sub>Mn<sub>2</sub>Ge<sub>3</sub> (RE: Ce—Nd) and a Possible Oxygen‐Interstitial Derivative Nd<sub>4</sub>Mn<sub>2</sub>Ge<sub>5</sub>O<sub>0.6</sub>.

2014· article· en· W2016048717 on OpenAlexaff
Anton O. Oliynyk, Kadar Djama‐Kayad, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueChemInform · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryArc meltingManganeseTernary operationRare earthAnnealing (glass)Derivative (finance)OxygenInorganic chemistryCrystallographyMetallurgyMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The title compounds are prepared by arc melting of the elements followed by annealing at 800 °C (7 d).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemInformSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207