MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2016089181 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2012.6399193

Threshold-Triggered Selective Phase-Forward of Differential PSK in Cooperative Communication

2012· article· en· W2016089181 on OpenAlexaff
Huai Tan, P. Ho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayPhase-shift keyingTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceModulation (music)Distortion (music)Quantization (signal processing)Differential codingAmplifierBit error rateTopology (electrical circuits)Control theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsAlgorithmDecoding methodsPhysicsBandwidth (computing)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study in this paper the performance of a one-way cooperative transmission system using differential PSK (DPSK) modulation with differential detection. As opposed to previous works which consider either a decode-and-forward (DF) or an amplify-and-forward (AF) relay, we adopt in this paper a phase-forward (PF) relay, whereby each forwarded symbol has constant modulus and a phase equals the phase of the corresponding relay's received symbol. The rationale for adopting this relaying strategy is to avoid potential non-linear amplifier distortion in an amplify-and-forward relay, as well as the implicit information loss/quantization in a DF relay. Through analysis and simulation, we found that this PF-DPSK cooperative transmission scheme has a lower bit-error rate (BER) than that of its DF counterpart. Furthermore, by adopting a threshold-based selective forwarding approach, it can attain a BER similar to that of AF. Finally, we anticipate that PF is most useful in two or multi-way relaying, in which any non-linear amplifier distortion on an AF signal will manifest into significant inter-modulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→