L’Exposition universelle de Paris (1900) et son influence sur les réseaux des femmes de lettres canadiennes1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le rôle de l’Exposition universelle de Paris en 1900 dans l’établissement des réseaux lettrés féminins France-Québec soulève plusieurs questions pertinentes, tant pour l’histoire littéraire des femmes que pour l’histoire de la littérature canadienne-française en général. En étudiant les antécédents de l’Exposition, la participation des Canadiennes à l’événement lui-même, puis, enfin, les retombées telles qu’on peut les mesurer dans l’usage que font les femmes de lettres des différents contacts qu’elles ont établis dans la capitale française, on est en mesure de mieux comprendre la façon dont ce réseau se met en place, sa nature, de même que ses conséquences sur la reconnaissance des femmes qui écrivent dans le champ littéraire canadien de l’époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".