MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016125081 · doi:10.1063/1.1608486

Spatially controlled, nanoparticle-free growth of InP nanowires

2003· article· en· W2016125081 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanowireChemical beam epitaxyWaferMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsEpitaxyQuantum dotSubstrate (aquarium)NanotechnologyNanoparticleChemical vapor depositionMolecular beam epitaxyExcited stateCrystal growthGallium arsenideChemistryCrystallographyLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A technique for the growth of InP nanowires, which does not rely on the vapor–liquid–solid growth mechanism, is demonstrated using selective-area chemical beam epitaxy. The nanowires are precisely positioned on an InP wafer and are always aligned along the available substrate 〈111〉A directions. They have diameters as small as 40 nm, and typical lengths of 600 nm. They are found to be optically active, with thin embedded InAs layers showing quantum-dot-like behavior with well-defined excited states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it