MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016128068 · doi:10.1002/chem.200990107

Cover Picture: Mechanisms in the Reaction of Palladium(II)–π‐Allyl Complexes with Aryl Halides: Evidence for NHC Exchange Between Two Palladium Complexes (Chem. Eur. J. 29/2009)

2009· paratext· en· W2016128068 on OpenAlexaff
Adrien T. Normand, M.S. Nechaev, K.J. Cavell

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2009
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalladiumArylChemistryIodideMetathesisCombinatorial chemistryPolymer chemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migrating birds N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) are known to form strong bonds with transition-metal complexes. In their Full paper on page 7063 ff., A. T. Normand, M. S. Nechaev, and K. J. Cavell describe a family of palladium(II) NHC complexes that undergo an autocatalytic reaction with aryl electrophiles in which no less than three PdNHC bonds are sequentially broken. The key step of this process is the concerted transfer of NHC and iodide ligands between two palladium complexes (see cover). This behavior is reminiscent of that of migrating birds, which have strong ties with their breeding grounds, but can travel away from them. In the case of NHCs, traveling too far can lead to a fatal issue if they “land” on a palladium complex from which reductive elimination can occur. Photography by Tim Holte, design by Joëlle Charpy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207