MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2016138401 · doi:10.7202/050568ar

Décisions rendues par le Conseil cannadien des relations du travail

2005· article· fr· W2016138401 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Graham Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations industrielles · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deux employés, non syndiqués mais membres d'une unité de négociation en grève, se sont vus refuser le droit de travailler pendant la grève, leur employeur ayant préféré avoir recours à des briseurs de grève. Dans leur plainte, ils ont allégué que ce refus de leur employeur constituait une pratique déloyale aux termes du sous alinéa 94(3)a)(vi) du Code. Le Conseil a décidé que l'employeur n 'avait pas commis une pratique déloyale puisque le Code ne confère pas aux employés visés le droit de continuer à exercer leurs fonctions au cours d'une grève. Le Cotiseil a aussi décidé que le sous-alinéa 94(3)a)(vi) ne violait pas les articles 2 et 15 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.008
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations industrielles→Same topicHealth, Medicine and Society→French-language works237,207→