MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016153938 · doi:10.1121/1.1703535

Passive amplification and directivity from air-coupled surface waves generated above a structured ground

2004· article· en· W2016153938 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles A. Daigle, Michael R. Stinson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectivityAcousticsSTRIPSTransverse planeGround planeSound pressureBeamformingWavelengthPhysicsOpticsRange (aeronautics)Finite element methodMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsComputer scienceStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An outdoor experiment is reported in which air-coupled surface waves are generated in the frequency range between 63 and 130 Hz above a strip of structured ground of finite width. Since the sound pressure above the structured ground can be greater than if the ground was rigid, passive amplification can be obtained. The experimental results are compared to theoretical calculations that use a boundary element method. Both predict gains of up to 6 dB, relative to the pressure on a rigid plane when the strip width is of the order of one wavelength. Due to their finite width, the surface wave strips have a directional response. For a source at a large distance from the strip, the sound pressure level is up to 6 dB greater for sound arriving along the axis of the strip than transverse. For sources near the strip, as might arise in a near-field beamforming application, this difference can be as much as 25 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207