MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016154001 · doi:10.3917/geoec.061.0095

Les enjeux d'un développement durable des activités spatiales

2012· article· fr· W2016154001 on OpenAlexaff
Gérard Brachet

Bibliographic record

VenueGéoéconomie/Géoéconomie · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace exploration and regulation
Canadian institutionsEspace pour la vie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les activités spatiales sont-elles durables sur le long terme ? La multiplication des acteurs dans l’Espace, la croissance rapide du nombre de satellites, concentrés sur les orbites les plus intéressantes, la prolifération inquiétante des débris spatiaux générés par les lancements et les désintégrations de satellites en fin de vie, les risques de collisions accidentelles ou d’agressions intentionnelles posent la question de la mise en place au plan international de règles de bonne conduite susceptibles d’assurer une meilleure sécurité des activités dans l’Espace. Les initiatives diplomatiques récentes ou en cours sont passées en revue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéoéconomie/GéoéconomieSame topicSpace exploration and regulationFrench-language works237,207