MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016176128 · doi:10.2118/171873-ms

Scale-Up and Transient Operation of CO2 Capture Plants at CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad

2014· article· en· W2016176128 on OpenAlexaff
Gelein M. de Koeijer, Knut Ingvar Aasen, Espen S. Hamborg

Bibliographic record

VenueAbu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
FundersAker Solutions ASA
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Scale (ratio)Environmental scienceCombustionProduct (mathematics)Climate changeComputer scienceEngineeringProcess engineeringGeographyChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM) is the world's largest facility for testing and improving technologies for post-combustion CO2 capture. The knowledge gained will prepare the ground for full scale CO2 capture initiatives to combat climate change. TCM is a joint venture between the Gassnova, Statoil, Shell and Sasol. It is located at the West coast of Norway, north of the city Bergen. This paper will discuss the scale-up and transient operation of amine based post-combustion CO2 capture plants in general, and presents some typical results. Scale-up and transient operation are typically among the last topics to be assessed in the technology development process because it requires bigger plants. Results were used from the monoethanolamine (MEA) campaign that was executed in fall/winter 2013/2014. The discussion on scale-up showed that emissions to air, material choice, construction method, vapour/liquid distribution and reclaiming are important technical aspects. Normalized transient data were presented for 7 important variables during a controlled plant stop-and-restart and a sudden stop-fast restart case. Stable CO2 product flow could be obtained after 3–4 hours, while stable emissions and CO2 product temperature took 1–2 hours more. NH3 emissions showed a peak after restart due to accumulation in the solvent during the stop. It was concluded that amine based CO2 capture plants should be able to follow their power plants without significant additional CO2 emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and ConferenceSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207